Category Archives: Quran

About TAKHLEES

The Quran, chapter 16/98: …When you read the Quran, you shall seek refuge in Allah from the Shaitaan the Rejected

Shirk is an offense not forgiven by Allah and those who indulge in shirk lose Allah’s protection against His punishments in this world and in the hereafter(4/48, 4/115). Shirk is generally understood as idol-worship and polytheism, which is a false understanding. This also results in a false understanding about monotheism/tawheed, because it is (also falsely) regarded as the anti-thesis of shirk. The false understanding that a monotheist/momin(believer in Tawheed/Allah’s oneness) cannot be a mushrik.

Shirk cannot be understood correctly without ‘ikhlaas’ as its antithesis. Shirk means neither idol-worship nor polytheism. It means ‘inclusiveness’ in ibadah/subservience of Allah. Inclusion of outside elements, elements that do not belong. Shirk is the condition of being inclusive/impure as opposed to ikhlaas, the condition of being exclusive(of outside elements)/pure. The word “ikhlaas” comes from the root

Kha-Laam-Saad, which is used in the Quran to means exclusiveness.

This website is named after the 112th chapter of the Quran, rightly titled, Al-Ikhlaas:


112/1: Say: Allah is ahad/unique.
112/2: Allah is Absolute.
112/3: He does not beget, nor is He begotten.
112/4: And there is none even comparable to Him.

Belief in Tawheed(Allah’s oneness) is the starting point of a believer. Al-Ikhlaas is something additional to the belief in Tawheed and necessary to keep the believers/monotheists free from shirk. In fact, this chapter is not about Allah’s Tawheed/Wahidiayyat/Oneness, as it is claimed to be. Allah is One indeed, but this particular chapter is about Allah’s Aahadiyyat/Uniqueness. Being wahid/one is not same as being ahad/unique:


One(wahid) can be included/associated(i.e. one can be made a shareek) with another. Logically, the one will still remain one, and at the same time be included/associated with the other. Therefore tawheed and shirk cannot logically be the antithesis of each other.

On the other hand, the one who is unique(ahad) cannot be rightfully included/associated(i.e cannot be made a shareek) with anyone else, because He is unlike everyone and everything. The one who is as unique/ahad as Allah(112/2-4) cannot be categorized with anyone else. Because He is not just one, He is also alone in His roles and His Attributes.

Due to His uniqueness/ahadiyyat, no one can rightfully be included/made shareek in any of His roles, for example:

He is the rightful Rabbinnaas(114/1), as the One who is the rabb/developer of the skies and the earth and all that is between them(19/65), exclusively deserves to be entrusted with the development/rabubiyyat of the people as well.

He is the rightful Malikinnaas(114/2), because the One who has the Mulk/Power/Dominance/Ownership of the skies and the earth(25/2) deserves exclusively to be the Malik/Dominator/King of the people as well i.e. the Power/Mulk He grants(3/26) to people deserves to be executed exclusively in accordance with His will, His book.

He is the rightful Ilahinnaas(114/3), because The One who is the Ilah in the skies and the Ilah in the earth(43/84) exclusively deserves to be regarded as the Ilah/’ultimate authority’ in all human affairs as well.

It is this recognition of Allah’s ahadiyat/uniqueness that can bring about ikhlaas/exclusiveness and eliminate shirk/inclusiveness from the believers’ lives, their ibadah/subservience, their deen/power-system.

This recognition is absent in the Muslim world.

Tawheed(oneness/monotheism) and shirk(inclusiveness) can co-exist under one roof. Ikhlaas and shirk cannot. A person can be momin(monotheist/believer in one Allah) and mushrik(inclusive) at the same time. But he/she cannot be mukhlis(exclusive) and mushrik
(inclusive) at the same time. Ikhlaas(exclusiveness) and shirk(inclusiveness) are the antithesis of each other. The traditional “Muslim” belief about Tawheed and Shirk, therefore, is fundamentally flawed, fundamentally unislamic/unquranic.

It is the mukhlis/exclusive ibadah of allah, and not mere belief in Tawheed, that is the decisive factor in sparing Allah’s punishment in this world and the hereafter:


4/118: Allah has cursed him(Shaitaan); and he had said: “I will assuredly take a definite portion of your servants/ibaad”.

38/82: He(Shaitaan) said: “By Your majesty, I will assuredly mislead them all.”
38/83: “Except for those among Your ibaad/servants who are al-mukhliseen/Exclusive(to You).”
38/84: He(Allah) said: “Therefore the Truth is, and the Truth is all I speak,”
38/85: “that I will fill Hell with you and all those who follow you.”

The verse below calls ‘mukhlis/exclusive ibadah'(al-ikhlaas/Exclusiveness) the siraat-e-mustaqeem/straight path(leading towards Allah):


15/39: He(Shiataan) said: My Lord! Because Thou hast sent me astray, I verily shall adorn the path of error for them in the earth, and shall mislead them collectively

15/40: Except for those among Your ibaad/servants who are mukhliseen/exclusive(to You).
15/41: He(Allah) said: This(mukhlis/exclusive ibadah) is the siraate mustaqeem/straight path incumbent upon Me.

In the same manner, the Quran also calls itself the siraat-e-mustaqeem(6/126).This equates mukhlis/exclusive ibadah of Allah(al-ikhlaas) with walking the path of the Quran exclusively during the course of one’s life. That is the only purpose that we are given life for:


51/56: And I have not created the jinns and humans except that they may give ibadah/service to Me

But ibadah is not what it is generally understood as. Ibadah is much more than worship. Ibadah is one’s subservience to Allah’s will in all matters dealt with in His book. And Allah’s ibadah/subservience/service cannot result without the implementation of His Hukm(Rule/Government/Verdict) in accordance with His Book.

This can happen only under Khilaafah(Representation of Allah’s Power and His Will) on a land where the Hukm/Rule/Government is dominated by those who have emaan/conviction in the sole authority of Allah and work for the islah/rehabilitation/reparation of the soceity. These khalaaif(representatives) will represent Allah’s will by ruling/governing in accordance with His Book. Only then can the believers make their subservience/ibadah exclusive/mukhlis(free from inclusiveness/shirk) for Allah. Only then will Al-islam be re-established. Those who think that al-islam is still in place and in practice should reconsider:


24/55: Allah promises those among you who believe and do works of islah/reparation, that He will make them khalaaif/representatives on earth, like He made representatives from those before them, and He will put in place for them their ‘deen/power-system/life-transaction'(which is to give ibadah/service to Allah, 10/104) which He has approved for them(i.e. al-islam, 5/6), and He will substitute security for them after fearThey shall give ibadah/service to Me, not including/making shareek with Me anything(i.e. ibadah will be exclusive/khaalis to Allah). And those who reject after that, they are the ones who are the wicked.

When Al-islam takes place, peace/harmony is attained and fear is replaced with security. The present state of the world(including the Muslim world) is hardly secure and peaceful. Nor is Al-islam promised to everyone who labels himself/herself a Muslim, but only to those who believe AND do works of islah/reparation. This promise does not suit the present-day Muslims, who are mostly those who believe AND commit shirk/inclusiveness in ibadah of Allah by upholding the hukm/rule/government/ of others beside Allah. According to Allah’s promise, under such conditions, Al-islam just cannot exist. So what “Islam”, then, have the Mullahs been preaching?

Whatever remains of al-Islam(or whatever it is that remains as Islam) today, remains as a ritualistic, superstitious religion, most of its beliefs and practices having nothing to do with the Quran. Al-Islam in Allah’s book is not a religion/faith. Al-Islam is the Deen/Power-system of Allah for those who have faith in Him, the believers, where Allah’s Hukm/Rule dominates all aspects of their lives. Al-islam is a moral and political code of life that the believers are indebted to living, in exchange for all the provisions of life given by Allah.

Man did not make any pledge before coming to this world to be subservient to man-made laws. He came into existence as a servant of Allah. Man is not obliged to and should not be made to follow any man-made rules/laws in matters already dealt with in the book of Allah. He is obliged only to give his ibadah/service to Allah by living in accordance with the rule/Hukm of His Book, and not to give it to Shaitaan:


36/60: “Did I not pledge to you, O Children of Adam, that you should not serve(give ibadah to) the Shaitaan? For certain he is your open enemy”

36/61: “And that you should serve(give ibadah to) Me? This is the straight path.”

But instead, it is Satan’s ibadah/servitude that is taking place all over the world, not in a ritualistic manner, but wherever people are made subservient/obedient to man-made laws instead of the divine laws. Any law contradictory to Allah’s laws is Satanic/evil, as there are only two sides in the world. The hizbullah/side of allah(5/56), and the hizbush shaitaan/side of Shaitaan(58/19). You are either with Allah, or you are against Him and against your own selves by siding with your own open enemy(the Shaitaan, 36/60). There is no middle path, no moderation. If one is not serving Allah exclusively, then it is the Shaitaan that he is including/making shareek with Allah in his service/ibadah.

In all aspects of people’s lives that are not governed in accordance with Allah’s book, and Allah’s book alone, the Shaitaan takes over and his ibadah fills the void wherever Allah’s ibadah is absent. The world today is shaitaan’s domain, run by his puppet regimes, both secular and religious[equally as “Godless” as the seculars]. Any regime that does not govern in accordance with Allah’s book is Satanic. The clergy and the religious regimes intensifying Book’s misuse in the private realm of religious rituals and superstitious practices and hiding the book’s message under piles of falsehood, while the secular regimes excluding the Book’s laws and verdicts from the social realm in the name of democracy. These are all puppets of Shaitaan(‘shaitaan’ literally meaning ‘alienated’/’alienating’ personality), and serve the same goal of alienating people to their Creator.

The superstitious uses of Allah’s book that are prevalent in the Muslim world is not how the book is supposed to be used. The Book of Allah was revealed so that people may establish Justice(al-qist) by ruling in accordance with it.


57/25: We have sent our messengers with Clarifications. And We revealed with them the Book(of Allah) and the Standard, so that people may establish Justice…

In fact, the Quran equates standing for Justice with the Shahadah(witnessing the oneness/tawheed of Allah, “la ilaha illa allah”)[3/18, 4/135, 5/8], the very basic Muslim belief, the starting point of a believer. But, in the presence of over a billion Muslims, the so-called followers of the Quran, there is widespread injustice and chaos in the world. Muslims, who are supposed to be establishers of Allah’s Justice and maintainers of the Divine standards for humanity(55/7-9), [currently in a condition of poverty/dependence that was promised by Shaitaan(2/268)], have become victims of zulm(injustice/mistreatment/oppression) themselves.

Justice can only prevail under the condition of Al-islam, (where the deenillah/power-system of Allah is enabled i.e. where power belongs to the khalaaif, those who represent Him by ruling/treating people in accordance with His book[24/55]) Any treatment of people, and of one’s self, that is in contradiction with the Quran is zaalim/unjust/oppressive. There can be no Justice without impartial treatment of people.

No Impartiality(al-adal) without hukum/ruling/governing in accordance with the book of Allah. Any government(“hukumat”) and judiciary(so-called “adal-iya”) not in accordance with the book of Allah cannot be impartial/equitible. All men(and women) are equal. No man can be subjected to man-made laws. The rule of man over man is unjust, oppressive and illegal. No present day regime is just and legal, none of them quranic/islamic, all of them Satanic.

All human beings should be subject only to Allah’s law. He created humanity from the point of nothingness(19/67). All people are equal by default before Him. Only He can judge/rule them most impartially/equitably. He is the ‘Khairul Hakimeen’/Best of the Rulers(7/87, 10/109, 12/80). He is the ‘Ahkamul Hakimeen’/the Most Decisive of Rulers(95/8). The ahkaam(rules/laws/judgments/verdicts) of His book are most impartial, most just.

The Quran is Allah’s book for moral and political guidance of the believers in all realms of life. The entire book is obligatory(28/85) upon them, not just the “five pillars”. Allah’s guidance cannot be restricted to the “religious” realms. He is the Rabbil alameen/Developer of all realms of existence(1/1), and Quran is the Developer’s manual/guidebook(20/50) for the humans to make the best use of their lives and resources. It is a complete detailing of His laws that govern people’s life(10/38, 6/114), perfect in truth and impartiality(6/115). It is the Furqan/Discriminator/Criterion(2/185) of true/false, just/unjust, moral/immoral.

Allah is for all time, and so are His words. The Quran is alive, never outdated, never irrelevant. Without the message of the Quran, it is the Muslims who have become outdated and irrelevant in the world. The

Quran is no ordinary book, it is as unique as its Author, a book apart from all others. It is fully detailed(7/52, 12/111, 17/12) as Allah does not run out of words. It is self-clarifying(4/26), as Allah’s word does not depend upon the additional words of man for clarification. The believers should not be in slightest doubt of this. They should uphold the authority of the Quran above all other authorities. No book in the world or even any traces of knowledge can take priority before the Quran(46/4).

But sadly, though they keep the Quran so close to themselves, YET they are SO far away from its messageSO ALIENATED to it that the Quran is the most “read”(parroted) YET least understood book for them. For a book kept so “close” and in such “high regard”, the general Muslims’ ignorance and alienation to its message is almost unimaginable. SUCH alienation can only be caused by THE Alienator, the Shaitaan and his human puppets.

Muslims have traded divine guidance in favour of manifest confusion. The most authentic sayings of the Messenger(peace be upon him) are recorded in the Quran by Allah Himself. This is one of them:


25/30: And the Messenger will say “My Rabb, my own nation has treated this Quran as a thing to be abandoned.”

Shame on the so-called Muslims for causing embarrassment and disappointment, in front of Allah, to the messenger who was sent as a ‘rehmatul lil aalameen’/mercy for all realms of existence. We cannot prevent that. We can, however, try not to be among those who will make it happen. We can try to be those who are loyal(mukhlis/exclusive/sincere) to the messenger of Allah and hold tight to what he brought us, the rope of Allah(3/103), the Quran exclusively…

Al-islam today is a dream for some of us, and a hallucination for others. This website(www.takhlees.blogspot.com) is an effort towards fulfilling that dream. Help this effort in any way that you can.


4/95: Those of the believers who sit still, other than those who are hurt/disabled, are not equal with those who strive in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has conferred on those who strive with their wealth and lives a rank above the sedentary. Unto each Allah has promised good, but He has bestowed on those who strive a great reward above the sedentary;



Fahad

11/88: …I only intend al-islah/Reparation/Rehabilitation to the best of my ability; and my success is with Allah. In Him I trust, and unto Him I look.

Sunnat of Allah

There are those who reject the unusual/extra-ordinary events mentioned in Al-Quran and often base their rejection upon the verses which mention the ‘sunnatullah'(practice of God). According to them all acts of Allah are His sunnat/practice and according them these verses say there is no change in any of His acts.

For example, one of the reasons they reject the virgin birth of Jesus because they say that sunnatullah is that a father is necessary for child’s birth. The fact is that they do not not quote the parts which spells out the sunnatullah. They deliberately leave out those parts or verses . These are what they usually quote:

17:77 Sunnat/practice of those we already sent before from our messengers. And you will not find any bypass for Our practice.

but they leave out 17/76 which spells out sunnat of Allah: “And they nearly frightened you to off the land to expel you from it. And then they would not have stayed after you except a little.”

They quote verse …

33:62 God’s practice with those who have passed away from before, and you will never find any replacement for God’s practice.

but they leave out 33/60-61 which spells out the sunnat of Allah:

33/60-61: “If the hypocrites, and those with disease in their hearts and those who spread lies in the city do not refrain, then We will let you overpower them, then they will not be able to remain as your neighbours except for a short while. They are cursed wherever they are found. They shall be taken and killed in a slaughter.”

They quote…

35:43 …You will not find any change in God’s practice. And you will not find any bypass for God’s practice.

but leave out the first part of the verse which spells out the sunnat of Allah:

35/43: “Arrogance in the land, and evil scheming. And the evil schemes only backfire on those who scheme them. Were they looking for anything different from the method used on the people of the past?”….

They quote:

48/23: God’s practice with those who have passed away from before, and you will not find any replacement for God’s practice.

But leave out the part that explains the sunnat…

48/22: And if those who do kufr had fought you, they would have turned the backs to you, then they would have found neither an ally nor a helper.

That is what Allah calls His sunnat, the parts which they leave out. Who do they think they are trying to deceive?! They ignore what Allah calls His sunnat, and come up with their own definitions of Allah’s sunnat in order to rationalize Al-Quran.


Fahad

Dividing Al-Quran into 'Paras'/smaller volumes

Quoting an article by Dr. Kamal Omar from

http://web.archive.org/web/20041015181033/www.thedivinebook.org/dividing.asp

Dividing The Scripture into smaller volumes

Allah has divided His Book in 114 Surahs and not ‘Paras’. You can group a few Surahs together and bind the Book in as many volumes as you wish, but the basis of division must be only in accordance with the Surahs. No other division into volumes is allowed under any terminology like Al-juzv (1/30th part) and Al-hizb (1/60th part) etc., since this amounts to blasphemy. To give an example the 13th Para closes after the first Ayat of the 15th Surah; and the 14th part, thus, starts at the 2nd Ayat of the 15th Surah. And still more blasphemous it is that the Opening Surah of Al-Kitab is kept outside the so-called 30 parts. It is clarified within the Text of the Scripture that Saban-min-Al-Masani (15/87) generally termed Surah Al-Fatiha (i.e., the Opening Surah) is the Ist Surah in the Divine arrangement of the Divine Text. The Text of the Book throws an open challenge to one similar Surah, in the 2nd Surah (2/23) and to produce ten Surahs in the eleventh Surah (11/13).

Continue reading

What is Tauraat and Injeel ?

Quote from http://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=7618.0

Salaamun alaikum all,

I read somewhere on this forum a question asking what at-tauraat and al-injeel are. I’d like to raise the subject here, if I may.

Lets go off on a tangent first and ask, ‘what is as-salaat’. Well, I say ‘as-salaat’ is the ritual prayer practised by Sunnis. Most people reading this would be shocked. ‘Why’, do you take as-salaat to be ritual prayers when the context clearly denies this?’ they would say. Good point, but why are people doing this with at-tauraat and al-injeel ? Why dissect salaat to the bone and leave at-tauraat and al-injeel alone ?

At-tauraat and al-injeel when translated as ‘torah and evangel’ i.e. the Old and New Testaments and thus accepted as ‘previous revelations’ also yields another issue. The issue of Quranic exegesis. Can the Quran be interpreted correctly using the OT and NT ?

If we to perform the same operation we performed on ‘as-salaat’ on at-tauraat and al-injeel, we would find the following :

1. Allah says at-tauraat contains ‘hukum Allah’/Allah’s ordainments, judgements, law’ (Quran 5/43). If we say that the OT contains God’s laws, then we would have to yield to some racist, barbaric laws.

2. In the Quran, you won’t find anywhere at-tauraat revealed to Musa. The
first 5 books of the OT are attributed to Musa. At-tauraat rather is taught to Isaa and Isaa does ‘confirm/tasdiq’. What it means to ‘tasdiq’ should be checked Quranically as well.

3. 5/47 says that let the people of al-injeel judge by it. Does the NT contain ANY judgements which are Quranic ? If so, what seperates it from any other
document also having Quranic elements ?

4. 5/46 says that al-injeel is a ‘sermon for al-muttaqeen’. The Quran itself is guidance for al-muttaqeen. If the Quran is fully detailed, why would al-muttaqeen need anything else ?

5. 5/66 says if they establish at-tauraat and al-injeel, they would find God’s provisions from above and below. Once again, contentually, you will find that this has nothing to do with the old and new testaments.

7. 48/29 contains descriptions of the people with Muhammad ar-rasulullah. 2 of these descriptions are said to be in at-tauraat and al-injeel. Neither the OT nor the NT contain this.

8. 9/111 yields a bargain made by Allah in at-tauraat and al-injeel, that Allah purchases the lives of the believers and thier wealth in return for the garden. Once again, you won’t find this in the OT and NT.

My conclusion : At-tauraat and al-injeel cannot be the OT and NT. Accepting them as such is acceptance without evidence. While the Quran itself gives tests of its authenticty , the OT and NT doesn’t recognise itself at all. Accepting it without evidence and without recourse to the Quranic text is dangerous for tafseer purposes.

I would expect a counter-argument going like ‘well, the Quran authenticates what is correct in the OT and NT’. That’s good, but does it mean you’re authorised to take the information which ISN’T authenticated as well ?
The Quran doesn’t only authenticate, but ASSERTS that at-tauraat and al-injeel contain :

1. descriptions of Muhammad’s followers (48/29)
2. promise made by Allah (9/111)

and neither OT nor NT has it.

My current view is that at-tauraat and al-injeel are both modes of operations practised by Isa. Once we understand that and practise it, we would be following the example of Isaa and achieve his victories (23/50 and 61/14).

Please comment and criticse.

thanks and salaam.

Quote from http://www.geocities.com/fingolfin_hk/tauraat-injeel.html

What exactly are the tauraat and injeel? This has been one of the many questions plaguing my mind for some time now. Though I daresay I am far from having absolute answers I do have a ‘theory’ regarding these things. To most these things are books, manuscripts. To me and a very small minority these things are not so much so books that are written on parchment, but rather something written on the people in some manner.

The tauraat seems to be something that speaks to the strict observance of the laws, rules, regulations, or methods. In 48:29 the example of the believers in al-tauraat is as those who are marked by their submissions. In 62:5 it seems to be pointing out that tauraat is indeed a strict observence of the laws/rules, etc because those who fail to uphold it are regarded as asses who hold the laws in little worth and reject them, thus it is just a burden for them. Another thing comes to mind when thinking of tauraat, it is a body of judgements/laws and it calls for equal retribution of a hurt. This seems to confirm the basic laws of nature, the laws of equality.

Injeel seems to be something that is a result of tauraat. Injeel seems to be the success that comes from the observance of the laws/rules. In 48:29 the example in Injeel is that of a fruitful sprouting which causes hatred in one’s enemies.

Divine Abbreviations / Huroof-e-Moqatte’at

I had been thinking whether the Quranic Initials / Huroof-e-Moqatte’at (Alif Laam Meem, Qaf, Ta Seen etc) are actually the initials/abbreviations of some words in the chapter that they occur in. The Initials also make a pattern (certain initials occurring with certain words). I am not sure yet, what they are. But I found this article interesting:

From http://www.thedivinebook.org/abbreviations.asp

Divine Abbreviations

The Abbreviated Letters or Isolated Alphabets called Huroof-e-Moqatte’at exist as a unique treasure in the Scripture, and Allah Himself calls them Pointers in the Book (Ayaat-ul-Kitab) at various places like 10/1, 12/1, 13/1, 15/1, 26/1, 27/1, 28/1 and 31/1. These pointers are available at the commencement of 29 Surahs of the Codex. These are present as a single alphabet in 38/1, 50/1 and 68/1; as two alphabets in 20/1, 27/1, 36/1, 40/1, 41/1, 42/1, 43/1, 44/1; 45/1 and 46/1; as three alphabets in 2/1, 3/1, 10/1, 11/1, 12/1, 14/1, 15/1, 26/1, 28/1, 29/1, 30/1, 31/1, 32/1 and 42/2; as four alphabets in 7/1 and 13/1; and as five alphabets in 19/1 only.

The total alphabets used in these pointers are fourteen and the total formations available are also fourteen when we delete the repetitions. The alphabets used are Alif, Ha, Ra, Seen, Saad, Tau, Ain, Qaaf, Kaaf, Laam, Meem, Nun, ha and ya. The fourteen formations used are Qaaf, Nun, Saad (single lettered), Tau ha, Tau Seen, Ya Seen, Ha Meem (two lettered); Alif Laam Meem, Alif Laam Ra, Tau Seen Meem, Ain Seen Qaaf (three lettered); Alif Laam Meem Saad, Alif Laam Meem Ra (four lettered); and Kaaf ha Ya Ain Saad (five lettered).

Every abbreviated letter or alphabet stands as the first letter of a word. The subject matter in the Surah becomes a guide and tells us that Qaaf stands for the word Quran, Nun stands for the title Z unnun (i.e., Prophet Yunus), Saad stands for the word Sabr and Tau stands for the word Tuwa. It is this practice within the Scripture which establishes a universal practice in every language to write one letter (initial alphabet for the word) to represent the word. It is quite frequent to write M for Muslim, S for Sindh, N for north, W for west, UK for United Kingdom, UNO for United Nations and NASA for National Aeronautics and Space Administration etc., etc. There is another example in the Quran wherein Allah presents the letter’s in figure-form in the word Ilyas; while it is presents in its sound-form in the word Ilyasin. See 6/85 and 37/123, 130.

The letter Tau stands for the word Tuwa and is a reference sign available in four different Surahs (20, 26, 27 and 28) of the Scripture. The 20th Surah contains many details about the incident when Allah spoke to Musa in the valley termed Tuwa. The same applies to the remaining three Surahs. Surah No. 79 contains the word Tuwa in its text but not an abbreviated Alphabet at the commencement of the Surah. Similarly, Surahs 26th to 28th contain Tau as an abbreviated letter at the commencement of the Surah and also a discussion of the incident in the text; but the word Tuwa is not available as such in these three Surahs.

Divine Abbreviations also point clues to solve certain confusions. Books like Literary History of the Arabs (Nicholson) and some allied Linguists breed confusion about the number of alphabets in the Arabic Lexicon. Since the pointer alphabets appear in 29 Surahs we get a hint that Arabic Language contains 29 alphabets and not 28 as propagated by this group as well as some others. When we ponder on mustahzeun (2/14), Anbeyhum (2/33), She’tuma (2/35), fad-da-rautum (2/72), Beysa (2/90), Tas-a-lu (2/108), ja-au (4/43) and sayyeatin (10/27) and so on, we become convinced that hamza is a definite letter or alphabet quite distinct from alphabet called Alif.

These Divine Pointers also preserve within them certain aspects of the history of Arabic Language. They point out that only 14 basic forms or figures have been utilized to make up 29 alphabets. It is only an application of dots (one, two or three) which forms the alphabets Ba, Taa, Saa out of the Divine Abbreviation termed Nun; Jeem and Kha out of Haa; alphabet Zaa out of Raa; alphabet Sheen out of Seen; Zaad out of Saad; Zau out of Tau; Ghain out of Ain and Faa out of Qaaf (by deleting one dot). By removing the belly from Ain we get the alphabet Hamza. By removing from Qaaf the two dots and deleting the belly partially, we get alphabet Vau, and by removing the head and reversing the belly we get alphabet Daal. This will become Z aal when we add one dot over it.

The so-called ‘expert linguists’ and ‘great historians’ have played to the Jewish tune to create confusions about the parent language of man. Arabic, the mother language can not exist for a day without the system of dots. It is a paralysed mind that cannot think when it says that Arabic script contained no letter-dots even till the end of the first century after the Prophethood of Muhammad. The format of the Divine Abbreviations (being single, double, triple, four or five lettered) again points to the root system in the language. In Arabic language words may be single lettered like Ba, Seen, Laam and Vau or these could be double lettered as In, Un, Min etc. The most common root in Arabic is triliteral or 3-lettered; and the next most common is 4-lettered; while only a few words have five root letters in their construction.

The Divine Abbreviations also play their due role in relation to the amazing Mathematical Coding in the Scripture which Allah refers to in the 74th Surah of His Codex.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

THE Book / Al Kitab

I seek refuge with Allah from the Shaitaan the rejected.

What Al-Kitab is not

Traditionally, in some occurrences of the word “Al-Kitab”, it is considered to be the same as Al Quran. And in other occurances it is confused with and translated as the “previous scriptures”. But actually “Al-Kitab” refers to neither of the two.

Take for example verse 2:2, which is mostly translated and understood as “This(al quran) is the Book(al-kitab)”. But the verse is actually saying “zaalika al-kitab” which means “that is the Book”, not “this“. From these very opening passages of Al-Quran, it should become very clear that by “zaalika al-kitab/that is the Book”, it is introducing us to another specific book, and not to itself.

The book points to itslef as “haaza/this al-quran”,”haaza kitab” or “haaza al-hadees” etc, but not even a single time as “haaza AL-kitab”.

So what is Al-Kitab then?

Al-Kitab: The subject matter for humanity

Al-Kitab is THE Book. It is the book of Allah / God. Throughout Al Quran, the terms “Al-Kitab” and “kitabillah”(book of Allah) refer to the same book. i.e the book introduced in verse 2:2 as “That is Al-Kitaab. No doubt therein. A guidance for al-muttaqeen.”

Al Kitaab was revealed with the prophets to judge between all people…

2/213: The people were one ummat, so Allah appointed the prophets as bearers of good news and warners, and He sent down with them Al-Kitab with the truth so that they may judge between the people wherein they differed…

According to verse 6:83-89, Allah gave Al-Kitab to the prophets including Ibrahim, Ishaaq, Yaqoob, Nooh, Dawood, Sulaiman, Ayub, Yusuf, Moosa, Haroon, Zakariya, Yahya, Eesa, Ilyas, Ismail, Yassa, Younis and Loot.

Everyone will be judged by Al-Kitab

Al-Kitaab was revealed with an-nabiyyeen/the prophets to judge between people,
2/213: The people were one ummat, so Allah appointed the prophets as bearers of good news and warners, and He sent down with them Al-Kitab with the truth so that they may judge between the people wherein they differed…

and on the Day of Resurrection everyone will be judged by it.

39/69: And the earth will shine with the light of its lord, and Al-Kitab will be placed, and the prophets and the witnesses will be brought forward, and it will be judged between them with the truth and they will not be oppressed.
39/70: And every nafs/psyche/self will be given in full to what it did and He knows best with what they do.

Hence Al-Kitaab is the subject matter for all humanity. On the Day of Judgment, when the whole of mankind will be gathered, and the prophets and witnesses will be brought forward, on that day Al-Kitab will be placed,and everyone will be held accountable by the same book: Al-Kitab. Thus al-kitab is the single most important subject, and the best book to study that subject is Al-Quran:

10/37: And this Al Quran is not such that it could be produced by other than Allah, but it is confirmation of what is between His hands and the tafseel/detail of Al-Kitab, no doubt in it, from the lord of the worlds.

Al-Quran is the tafseel/detailing of Al-Kitab(10:38). Al-Quran is Al-Haqq with which Al-Kitab is revealed mufassal.

6/114: Shall I seek other than Allah as a judge and He has revealed to you Al-Kitab mufassal/detailed. Those to whom We have given Al-Kitaab know that it is revealed from your Lord, with Al-Haqq(Al-Quraan). So do not be of those who doubt.

Prophets of the past also received revelation in Arabic language

Al-Kitab contains muhkamaat ayaat i.e. the verses containing hukm/judgment. These verses are the ‘ummil kitab’(um/mother of Al-Kitab):

3:7 He it is who has revealed Al-Kitab upon you. From it are muhkamat ayaat. They are the ummul kitab/mother of Al-Kitab…

The ‘ummul kitab’ contains ‘al-kitaab al-mubeen’ which is an Arabic reading:

43/1-4: Ha Meem. And ‘Al-Kitab al mubeen’. Surely, We have made it an Arabic reading, that you may be able to understand. Surely it is in the ‘um’/source of Al-Kitab with Us, the high, the wise.

Hence the hukm in Al-Kitaab is in Arabic language, and so was the one revealed to the prophets of the past who were given Al-Kitab by Allah(in verse 6:89).

13/36: And those whom We have given Al-Kitab rejoice at what has been sent to you. And out of Al-Ahzab there is that person who denies some of it. Say: “Surely what I have been commanded is that I serve Allah and I do not associate with Him. To Him I invite and to Him is the return.”
13/37: And
like that, We have sent it down as an Arabic hukm/judgment…

It means hukm revealed now is Arabic just like it was revealed to those given Al-Kitab by Allah i.e the prophets.

The message revealed in Arabic language is also in the zubur of the people of the past.

26/192-196: Surely, it(the message) is revealed by the lord of the worlds. Revealed with it the true spirit. Upon your heart that you may be from the warners. With the clear/mubeen Arabic language. And surely it is in the zubur of the earlier ones.

Revelation has always been in Arabic language because it is a language that provides details. Had the book been revealed some other language, people would have complained about the lack of details of its verses.

41/44: And had We made it a foreign (non-arabic) reading, they would have said “Why are its verses not detailed?”…

How well-known is the book of Allah?

‘Allazeena ootul kitab’/Those who are been given Al-Kitab are those who are capable of clarifying it for the people. But instead, they break the covenant to purchase cheap gains.

3/187: And when Allah took the covenant of those who were given Al-Kitab: “Clarify it for the people, and do not hide it”; But they threw it behind their backs and purchased with it a little price. Evil is what they purchase.

Other scriptures and religions copied from Al-Kitab

In addition to Al-Kitab already being kept hidden from the people(3:187), others write their own versions of Al-Kitab by copying from it, and then make claims of their divinity. The Evangels/Gospels, Torahs and the Hadiths etc appear to have been copied from the Al-Kitab.

And that is still being done, people are still copying from Al-Kitab, for example “The True Furqan”, a recent attempt at producing a “sura like it”(2:23) :

2/79: So woe to those who write Al-Kitab with their hands, and then they say “This is from the presence of Allah”, so that they may purchase a small gain with it. Woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they earn.

Distortion of language with Al-Kitaab

Another group distorts their language to make it sound similar to Al-Kitab, so that people may confuse the new words with the words and language in Al-Kitab.

Some examples:

“Ahlal bayt” to Ahlal bayt/Shias
“Al-islam” to Islam
“muslim” to Muslim
“At-tauraat” to Torah
“Darussalam” to Jerusalem
(More on this later)

3:78 And among them is a group that twist their language with Al-Kitab, so that you may think it is from Al-Kitab, while it is not from Al-Kitab. And they say “It is from the presence of Allah”, while it is not from the presence of Allah. And they say the lie against Allah while they know.


Fahad

Related articles:

What are the “books/kutub” of God?
Ahlal Kitab
Those who are given Al-Kitab by God
Those who are given Al-Kitab


Digg!